SEQUENCING: planSequence versus planBasicTours

This forum deals with any kind of trip optimization whether it is automatic planning or manual dispatching, refering to transport orders or service planning.

SEQUENCING: planSequence versus planBasicTours

Postby Bernd Welter » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:49 pm

Hi there,

today I discussed the following reoccuring topic with our global consultants:
A customer describes his usecase as a sequencing topic
  • He wants to optimize a single ressource
  • He approaches this with planSequence
  • He wants to know how to parametrize this scenario
So what I experienced several times in the past is
  • a customer starts implementation with planSequence
  • he complains about poor quality of planing results ("my dispatcher finds a better solution")
  • we analyse his scenario
  • we find a better solution but with changes in the touropt.ini (using different planning algorithms)
  • we tell him to use planBasicTours instead because it is more flexible (I prefer "approaching the methods by API" over "approach methods by TOUROPT.ini") but...
  • ...we would limit his license file to xtour.maxVehicleCount=1 and xtour.planBasicToursAllowed=true
  • he complains about "I already spent so much time in planSequence"

I helped many players with this approach and therefore I'd like to recommend this on a generic base.
Under the roof planSequence is using the same component as planBasicTours.
But while you can override the steps via planBasicTours this is not possible with planSequence: the methods used in planSequence are not available through the API.

Check this:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=143&p=494&hilit=planSequence#p494

Feedback is welcome!

Best regards,
Bernd
Bernd Welter
Manager Technical Consulting & Requirement Engineering
Senior Technical Consultant Developer Components
PTV GROUP - Germany

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgkUli9yGf0gwTDdxbMZ-Kg
User avatar
Bernd Welter
Site Admin
 
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:28 am

Return to PTV xTourServer