Questions about HBEFA / measurement units

This forum deals with any kind of routing computation whether it is simple A:B-routing, calculation of isochrones, simple matrix computation or nearest search.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bernd Welter
Site Admin
Posts: 2574
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:28 am
Contact:

Questions about HBEFA / measurement units

Post by Bernd Welter »

Cheers and welcome in 2022!

Recently I am dealing with more and more questions when it comes to emission calculation. The following question refers to HBEFA (Handbook of Emission Factors) and I'd like to gather the details here. I hope this info is very helpful for those of you who deal with the Emission Calculation.
Here we go:
When I get HBEFA emission from PTV, the result is something like(I only added the measurement unit) :
{
"hydrocarbons" : 10.980518059922922 - g
"ammonia" : 0.38452199999999975 - g
"carbonDioxide" : 103.73796777864813 - kg
"carbonMonoxide" : 55.04731854349741 - g,
"nitrogenOxides" : 454.27380011806025 - g
"fuelConsumption" : 32.63185594215313 - kg
"benzene" : 0.18342729152359694 - g
"numberOfParticles" : 9.818865050144606E15,
"hydrocarbonsExceptMethane" : 10.717246994539957 - g
"sulphurDioxide" : 0.5219520164427847 - g
"methane" : 0.2636018331649443 - g
"nitrogenDioxide" : 95.397495868253 - g
"particles" : 4.437653087658653 - g
}
I have noticed that most of the emissions are reported in grams or kg. (with the logical exception of numberOfParticles).
My question for you is: Is the carbonDioxide value(the one in kg) - the total value of the other emissions in CO2 equivalents?
And here's my response and the additional info from DEV:
There's a difference between the substance "CO2" and the term "CO2e" (=CO2 Aequivalent). The HBEFA standard 3.2 and before return "the mass of CO2 emitted on the route (or segment...)". To gather the total CO2e from a HBEFA 3.2 (or earlier) calculation a user would have to multiply each emitted substances mass with the specific factor also known as Global Warming Potential and then sum up the specific CO2e values.

From HBEFA 4.1 there's also a return value for CO2e but this hasn't been implemented as of today.

And here's the DEV statement:
In HBEFA data, there are 3 values for CO² :
- CO2-total (= carbon dioxide “total”, computed as total CO2 from fuel consumption; see below)
- CO2-rep (= carbon dioxide “reported”, i.e. without the biofuel share in the fuel, see below)
- CO2e (CO2 equivalents)

With the following notes:
- CO2 equivalents contain CO2, CH4 and N2O, i.e. the relevant greenhouse gases from the transport sector, multiplied with their respective 100-year Global Warming Potentials and summed up.
- The CO2 emissions are calculated as “total CO2“ – based on the assumption that the carbon in the fuel is totally oxidised into CO2. In addition, HBEFA 3.1/3.2 also provide “„CO2-rep(orted)“ which considers only the „fossil“ part of the fuel without the biofuel share. This fraction is based on country specific assumptions”

So finally, you are totally right. In xServer2, we only return the CO2-total and CO2-rep values.
The CO2e is new in HBEFA 4.1 and has not been integrated.
If you have questions: do not hesitate to respond to the post or approach me 1:1!

Bernd
Bernd Welter
Technical Partner Manager Developer Components
PTV Logistics - Germany

Bernd at... The Forum,LinkedIn, Youtube, StackOverflow
I like the smell of PTV Developer in the morning... :twisted:
romulus.pasca
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 9:25 am

Re: Questions about HBEFA / measurement units

Post by romulus.pasca »

Hi Bernd,
Do you guys have a timeline for the HBEFA 4.1 integration on the xServer?

Best Regards, Romulus
User avatar
Bernd Welter
Site Admin
Posts: 2574
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:28 am
Contact:

Re: Questions about HBEFA / measurement units

Post by Bernd Welter »

OK, probably not the optimal design choice:

What we name "HBEFA_4" is in fact 4.1 Calculating Emissions for a Routing with a Comprehensive Approach

What we probably didn't implement so far is the return of the CO2e... Your sample mentions 13 properties - which standard is this supposeed to be?

Sorry for the confusion,

Bernd
Attachments
Release Notes
Release Notes
Bernd Welter
Technical Partner Manager Developer Components
PTV Logistics - Germany

Bernd at... The Forum,LinkedIn, Youtube, StackOverflow
I like the smell of PTV Developer in the morning... :twisted:
User avatar
Bernd Welter
Site Admin
Posts: 2574
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:28 am
Contact:

Re: Questions about HBEFA / measurement units

Post by Bernd Welter »

Additional comments

Sebastien:
The suffix « HBEFA_4 » in the API entities is used to support the latest available 4.x standard (we first hesitated with HBEFA_4_x to avoid confusions, but finally this name was preferred).
Today we have 4.1 data. A version 4.2 will likely be available soon or later. Then we will only have to update the data, without extending the API. This will be easier for the integrators because they will be able to upgrade their emission data without any code adaptions.
Yann:
The major version number ‘4’ is upgraded when there are some changes on how the emission is calculated or when there are new data (i.e. extension of the format). For version 4, there are new pollutants and new information on the LOS pattern.
Then the minor version number just changes when there are some updates of factors.
From what I know, there is no version ‘x.0’. It always start at 1 => 4.1
In xRoute, we just specify version 4, because we know that there won’t be any other pollutants in the future for version 4.x. If there are new pollutants, it will be in version 5…
GREAT! Merci, mes amis francais!

Bernd
Bernd Welter
Technical Partner Manager Developer Components
PTV Logistics - Germany

Bernd at... The Forum,LinkedIn, Youtube, StackOverflow
I like the smell of PTV Developer in the morning... :twisted:
Post Reply